Dearborn v. Turner

16 Me. 17
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided June 15, 1839·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was subsequently drawn up by

Weston C. J.

The plaintiff delivered to Nason a cowand a calf, for which he took his written promise, to return the samo cow within a year, with a calf by her side, or to pay twenty-two dollars and fifty cents. We are very clear, that the security of the [18]*18plaintiff vested in contract; and that Nason, having the alternative to return or pay, the property passed to him, and he was at liberty to sell the cow. Tibbets v. Towle, 3 Fairf. 341, was a very different case-. There the plaintiff expressly reserved to himself the title to the oxen, until paid for. The case of Hurd v. West, 7 Cowen, 752, decides expressly, that where an alternative exists, the title to the property, in a case like this, is transferred upon the' delivery.

Plaintiff nonsuit-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dearborn v. Turner, 16 Me. 17 (Me. 1839).

16 Me. 17 (Dearborn v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Concordia Fire Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. McCarty Motor Co.
45 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
William Frantz & Co. v. Fink
52 So. 131 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)
Wm. Franz & Co v. Fink
6 Teiss. 239 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1909)
Jacob Strauss Saddlery Co. v. Kingman & Co.
42 Mo. App. 208 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Buswell v. Bicknell
17 Me. 344 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1840)