Dear v. Weineke
This text of 29 P. 646 (Dear v. Weineke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought to recover certain taxes claimed to have been paid under duress, and which it is declared by the appellant were not collectible, by reason of the assessment being invalid.
The individual whose personal property was assessed ■gave a list of it in detail, as lie states in his complaint, the assessor, but that official did not list the property in detail, but made this entry in the assessment-book: 61 Value of personal property, exclusive of money and .solvent credits, $15,725.”
The complaint is demurred to as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff not desiring to amend his complaint, judgment passed for the defendant, from which the present appeal is prosecuted.
The only question involved is, whether the form of the assessment set out in the assessor’s book was sufficient, under section 3650 of the Political Code; and- that it was sufficient is, in effect, decided in San Francisco v. Pennie, 93 Cal. 465, and upon the authority of that case the judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 P. 646, 94 Cal. 322, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dear-v-weineke-cal-1892.