DeAngelo v. Maximus

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 14, 2021·No. 7:19-cv-07957·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK me er ere tet ne ene eee eee ee YE DEBORAH DEANGELO, Case #: 7:19-cv-07957 (CS) Plaintiff, -against- PARTIAL AND FINAL JUDGMENT MAXIMUS/NY MEDICAID CHOICE, SULLIVAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendants. er en eae eae cst te ne nnn nena □□□ errr nee ene □ Whereas, the above entitled action having been assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel, and Judge Seibel having issued a Bench Ruling on December 4, 2020 granting Defendant Sullivan County Department’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that Final Judgment is entered in favor of defendant SULLIVAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES dismissing and removing said defendant from the action, in accordance with FRCP Rule 54(b). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14 _, 2021

CATHY cm U.S.D.J.

“and the Court finding no just reason for delay, given that the claims remaining are not similar or closely related to the claims against the dismissed Defendant, see Ginett v. Computer Task Group, Inc. 962 F.2d 1085, 1091-96(2d Cir. 1992); Hogan v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 961 F.2d 1021, 1025 (2d Cir. 1992),

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeAngelo v. Maximus, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

DeAngelo v. Maximus (DeAngelo v. Maximus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related