DeAngelo Boston v. St. Thomas Place Apartments
This text of DeAngelo Boston v. St. Thomas Place Apartments (DeAngelo Boston v. St. Thomas Place Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 22, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00401-CV
DEANGELO BOSTON, Appellant V. ST. THOMAS PLACE APTS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00709-D
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Pedersen, III, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III This is an appeal from the trial court’s amended final judgment of possession
in a forcible-detainer suit. The judgment was not superseded, and a writ of
possession was served on appellant. Because it appeared appellant was no longer in
possession of the property, and a forcible detainer action generally becomes moot
when the tenant is no longer in possession of the premises, we questioned our
jurisdiction over the appeal. See Marshall v. Housing Auth. of City of San Antonio,
198 S.W.3d 782, 785, 787 (Tex. 2006) (possession of premises is only issue in
forcible detainer action; issue of possession becomes moot when tenant vacates
property unless tenant has “potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession”); Olley v. HVM, L.L.C., 449 S.W.3d 573, 575 (Tex. App.—Houston
[14th Dist.] 2014, pet. denied) (appellate courts lack jurisdiction over moot
controversies).
By letter dated May 19, 2022, we directed appellant to file a letter brief
addressing the Court’s concern and cautioned that failure to comply by May 31, 2022
could result in dismissal of the case. To date, appellant has not filed a letter brief or
otherwise communicated with the Court.
When a case becomes moot on appeal, the appellate court must set aside the
trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case. See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 785, 790.
Accordingly, on the record before us, we vacate the trial court’s amended final
judgment of possession and dismiss the case as moot. See id. at 790.
/Bill Pedersen, III// 220401f.p05 BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DEANGELO BOSTON, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-22-00401-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00709- D. ST. THOMAS PLACE APTS, Opinion delivered by Justice Appellee Pedersen, III, Justices Partida- Kipness and Nowell participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s April 26, 2022 amended final judgment and DISMISS the case.
Judgment entered this 22nd day of June 2022.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DeAngelo Boston v. St. Thomas Place Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deangelo-boston-v-st-thomas-place-apartments-texapp-2022.