Deaner v. Storme
This text of 8 Ky. Op. 56 (Deaner v. Storme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The rendition of the judgment on the amended petition in less-than twenty days from the service of the summons, although erroneous, was but a clerical misprision, and can only be corrected by motion in the court below. Civ. Code, § 578.
Although both notes are liens upon the land, they constitute separate and distinct promises to pay. If both had been due, they both might have been declared on in the original petition, but still they constitute different causes of action.
It is made clear from the proof that no such contract as is set up in defendant’s answer was made between the parties. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ky. Op. 56, 1874 Ky. LEXIS 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deaner-v-storme-kyctapp-1874.