DeAndre Currington v. Commander Juneau

Eleventh Circuit

DeAndre Currington v. Commander Juneau

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 26, 2024

Docket24-13183

StatusUnpublished

This text of DeAndre Currington v. Commander Juneau (DeAndre Currington v. Commander Juneau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeAndre Currington v. Commander Juneau, (11th Cir. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-13183 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13183 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

DEANDRE D. CURRINGTON, Plaintiﬀ-Appellant, versus COMMANDER JUNEAU, DEPUTY CHIEF BRYAN, DUSTIN R. FOLK, Cpl.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-13183 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/26/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13183

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-00397-MHT-CSC ____________________

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of juris- diction is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. While the district court has entered numerous orders resolving DeAndre D. Currington’s various motions in this pending case, none of those orders ended the underlying litigation on the merits and, accord- ingly, none of those orders are final. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000); Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012). Most of those orders concerned discovery, amendment of pleadings, and appointment of counsel, matters which are not ordinarily immediately appealable. See Doe No. 1 v. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1004 (11th Cir. 2014) (concerning dis- covery orders); Wells v. S. Main Bank, 532 F.2d 1005, 1005-06 (5th Cir. 1976) (concerning amendment of pleadings); Hodges v. Dep’t of Corr., 895 F.2d 1360, 1361-62 (11th Cir. 1990) (concerning appoint- ment of counsel). Further, none of those orders are appealable as collateral orders because they would all be reviewable on appeal from a final judgment. See Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 989 (11th Cir. 2022).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USCA11 Case: 24-13183 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13183 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

DEANDRE D. CURRINGTON, Plaintiﬀ-Appellant, versus COMMANDER JUNEAU, DEPUTY CHIEF BRYAN, DUSTIN R. FOLK, Cpl.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-13183 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 12/26/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13183

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-00397-MHT-CSC ____________________

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of juris- diction is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. While the district court has entered numerous orders resolving DeAndre D. Currington’s various motions in this pending case, none of those orders ended the underlying litigation on the merits and, accord- ingly, none of those orders are final. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000); Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012). Most of those orders concerned discovery, amendment of pleadings, and appointment of counsel, matters which are not ordinarily immediately appealable. See Doe No. 1 v. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1004 (11th Cir. 2014) (concerning dis- covery orders); Wells v. S. Main Bank, 532 F.2d 1005, 1005-06 (5th Cir. 1976) (concerning amendment of pleadings); Hodges v. Dep’t of Corr., 895 F.2d 1360, 1361-62 (11th Cir. 1990) (concerning appoint- ment of counsel). Further, none of those orders are appealable as collateral orders because they would all be reviewable on appeal from a final judgment. See Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 989 (11th Cir. 2022).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

DeAndre Currington v. Commander Juneau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deandre-currington-v-commander-juneau-ca11-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack