DEANDRE ARNOLD v. THE HONORABLE CRAIG SCHWALL, JUDGE

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 15, 2024·No. A25E0039·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 15, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25E0039. DEANDRE ARNOLD v. THE HONORABLE CRAIG SCHWALL, JUDGE et al.

The petitioner’s motion for an emergency writ of mandamus does not include the required filing fee or a sufficient affidavit of indigency per OCGA § 5-6-4 and Court of Appeals Rule 5.

While in some instances OCGA 9-1-1 allows an unsworn declaration to substitute for a notarized document, the petitioner’s unsworn declaration does not meet the statutory requirements as to form and content pursuant to OCGA § 9-1-1 (f).

Accordingly, the motion is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/15/2024

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DEANDRE ARNOLD v. THE HONORABLE CRAIG SCHWALL, JUDGE, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

DEANDRE ARNOLD v. THE HONORABLE CRAIG SCHWALL, JUDGE (DEANDRE ARNOLD v. THE HONORABLE CRAIG SCHWALL, JUDGE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 5-6-4
Georgia § 5-6-4
§ 9-1-1
Georgia § 9-1-1