Deana Kinder v. City of Myrtle Beach
This text of 700 F. App'x 287 (Deana Kinder v. City of Myrtle Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Deana J. Kinder and Anthony K. Kinder appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their action as barred by the South Carolina statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record provided on appeal and the arguments of the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm in part for the reasons stated by the district court. Kinder v. City of Myrtle Beach, No. 4:15-cv-01416-RBH, 2017 WL 227969 (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2017).
The Kinders also seek to appeal from the order entered by federal district court in Ohio transferring this case to the district court in South Carolina. We are without jurisdiction to consider a transfer order entered by a district court not within our territorial jurisdiction. See Preston Corp. v. Raese, 335 F.2d 827, 828 (4th Cir. 1964); see 28 U.S.C. § 1294(1) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 F. App'x 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deana-kinder-v-city-of-myrtle-beach-ca4-2017.