Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Paulzak

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Paulzak

634 So. 2d 321, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3290, 1994 WL 113633

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1994·No. No. 93-3688·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (Dean Witter) appeals an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. Dean Witter correctly asserts that the Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration (Form U-4) agreement executed by the parties is applicable and that the unambiguous language of the Form U-4 agreement requires that the dispute between Dean Witter and Gary Paulzak be arbitrated under the rules, constitutions, or by-laws of the organizations indicated in the agreement. Accordingly, the order appealed is REVERSED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (Dean Witter) appeals an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. Dean Witter correctly asserts that the Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration (Form U-4) agreement executed by the parties is applicable and that the unambiguous language of the Form U-4 agreement requires that the dispute between Dean Witter and Gary Paulzak be arbitrated under the rules, constitutions, or by-laws of the organizations indicated in the agreement. Accordingly, the order appealed is REVERSED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Paulzak, 634 So. 2d 321, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3290, 1994 WL 113633 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

634 So. 2d 321 (Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Paulzak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.