Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Clarke
This text of 617 So. 2d 402 (Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., Alfred L. Caliendo, Bruce P. Cotten and Timothy P. Maloney, Appellants,
v.
George C. CLARKE, III, Individually and/or as Trustee UTA DTD 12/23/83, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Broome, Kelley, Aldrich & Warren, and Randy D. Ellison; Morgan, Lewis, Bockius and Peter Buscemi, for appellants.
Goodman & Nekvasil, and Kalju Nekvasil, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
This case presents the identical issue of the arbitrability of a limitations defense under the standard Dean Witter customer agreement which was involved in Victor v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 606 So.2d 681 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), review denied, 614 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1993), and Marschel v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 609 So.2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), review denied, 617 So.2d 318 (Fla. 1993). The decision below that the dispute must be arbitrated is affirmed on the authority of those decisions, with which we are in complete agreement.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
617 So. 2d 402, 1993 WL 120534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-witter-reynolds-inc-v-clarke-fladistctapp-1993.