Dean W. Smith, M.D. and Eghtedar Sadeghpour, M.D., Individually, and Derivatively on Behalf of Houston Surgery Center, L.P., and Outpatient Specialty Surgery Partners, L.P. v. Jack E. Jensen, M.D., Surgical Care Outpatient Enterprises, L.L.C., Athletic Orthopedic and Knee Center, P.A., and Managed Rehabilitation, Inc.
This text of Dean W. Smith, M.D. and Eghtedar Sadeghpour, M.D., Individually, and Derivatively on Behalf of Houston Surgery Center, L.P., and Outpatient Specialty Surgery Partners, L.P. v. Jack E. Jensen, M.D., Surgical Care Outpatient Enterprises, L.L.C., Athletic Orthopedic and Knee Center, P.A., and Managed Rehabilitation, Inc. (Dean W. Smith, M.D. and Eghtedar Sadeghpour, M.D., Individually, and Derivatively on Behalf of Houston Surgery Center, L.P., and Outpatient Specialty Surgery Partners, L.P. v. Jack E. Jensen, M.D., Surgical Care Outpatient Enterprises, L.L.C., Athletic Orthopedic and Knee Center, P.A., and Managed Rehabilitation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion granted and Abatement Order filed March 8, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-21-00686-CV ____________
DEAN W. SMITH, M.D. AND EGHTEDAR SADEGHPOUR, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY, AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF HOUSTON SURGERY CENTER L.P., AND OUTPATIENT SPECIALTY SURGERY PARTNERS, L.P., Appellants
V.
JACK E. JENSEN, M.D., SURGICAL CARE OUTPATIENT ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., ATHLETIC ORTHOPEDIC AND KNEE CENTER P.A., AND MANAGED REHABILITATION, INC., Appellees
On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-90730
ABATEMENT ORDER
Before the court is the parties’ joint motion to abate, which seeks to abate this appeal due to the parties agreeing in principle to settle the underlying lawsuit and all related disputes and proceedings. Although the parties have not yet reached a final resolution to their disputes, they have stated that an abatement would facilitate such a resolution. As the motion has merit, the court hereby grants the motion.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket for ninety days from the date of this order. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dean W. Smith, M.D. and Eghtedar Sadeghpour, M.D., Individually, and Derivatively on Behalf of Houston Surgery Center, L.P., and Outpatient Specialty Surgery Partners, L.P. v. Jack E. Jensen, M.D., Surgical Care Outpatient Enterprises, L.L.C., Athletic Orthopedic and Knee Center, P.A., and Managed Rehabilitation, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-w-smith-md-and-eghtedar-sadeghpour-md-individually-and-texapp-2022.