Dean v. . Steel

1 N.C. 767
CourtCourt of King's Bench
DecidedJuly 5, 1793
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 767 (Dean v. . Steel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dean v. . Steel, 1 N.C. 767 (kingsbench 1793).

Opinion

Case. The plaintiff declared that for two years past he had used the trade of sheering and dressing wool, and that the defendant, to injure him in his trade, said the following words to him: Thou openedst my pack anddidst put in wet wool; and DODERIDGE and WHITLOCK, JJ., were of opinion that the action lies, because it is a deceit in trade to put in wet wool, which is heavier than dry wool. And so to say of a silk dyer, that he puts pindust in his salt, which renders the silk heavier, whereby he may subtract part of it. 24 Eliz., Sandford makes such good cloth (he being an eminent clothier) that everyone will give more for the cloth that has hismark than any other. Another man made bad cloth and put Sandford's mark to it, wherefore he sued him and recovered. Likewise, if one says of a fuller, that he stops holes made in filling, with flocks, an action lies. Godb., 435.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-steel-kingsbench-1793.