Home/Indiana Supreme Court/Dean v. State

Dean v. State

441 N.E.2d 457, 1982 Ind. LEXIS 1004
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 12, 1982·No. 580S122·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PRENTICE, Justice.

This opinion is supplemental to our opinion herein filed April 14, 1982, 433 N.E.2d 1172, the content hereof having been inadvertently omitted.

ISSUE VII

Defendants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In so doing they ask us to rejudge the credibility of the prosecutrix who identified them in court as her assailants. Her uncorroborated testimony, which is the only evidence linking Defendants to the crimes, is sufficient to sustain the convictions for Rape, Tillman v. State, (1981) Ind., 426 N.E.2d 1149, 1150, Robbery, Geisleman v. State, (1980) Ind., 410 N.E.2d 1293, 1295, and Kidnapping, Maclin v. State, (1979) Ind., 394 N.E.2d 163, 165.

We find no reversible error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

GIVAN, C.J., and DeBRULER, HUNTER and PIVARNIK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dean v. State, 441 N.E.2d 457, 1982 Ind. LEXIS 1004 (Ind. 1982).

441 N.E.2d 457 (Dean v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Denney v. State
695 N.E.2d 90 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1998)
Stowers v. State
657 N.E.2d 194 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1995)
Pike v. State
557 N.E.2d 1 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1990)
Lahrman v. State
501 N.E.2d 1109 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1986)
Holt v. State
463 N.E.2d 466 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1984)
Marbley v. State
461 N.E.2d 1102 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1984)
Locke v. State
461 N.E.2d 1090 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1984)
Bean v. State
460 N.E.2d 936 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1984)
Richardson v. State
456 N.E.2d 1063 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1983)
Stone v. State
444 N.E.2d 1214 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1983)