Dean v. State

60 So. 3d 532, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6054, 2011 WL 1601409
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 2011·No. No. 1D10-2214·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in failing to give Appellant, Antonio Dewayne Dean, the opportunity to address the court before imposing sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(b). Ventura v. State, 741 So.2d 1187, 1189 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM Appellant’s convictions and the revocation of his probation, REVERSE Appellant’s sentences, and REMAND for a new sentencing hearing.

DAVIS, LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dean v. State, 60 So. 3d 532, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6054, 2011 WL 1601409 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

60 So. 3d 532 (Dean v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ELIZA WATTIEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
HARVEY MICHAEL HILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
246 So. 3d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Guichard Jean-Baptiste v. State
155 So. 3d 1237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)