Dean v. State

58 So. 3d 322, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3890, 2011 WL 985130
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 2011
DocketNo. 1D10-0230
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 So. 3d 322 (Dean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dean v. State, 58 So. 3d 322, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3890, 2011 WL 985130 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the State’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion, and substitute the following in its place.

[323]*323The appellant was convicted of one count of first-degree murder, two counts of armed robbery, and one count of armed burglary. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment with a mandatory minimum sentence of life imprisonment. In our prior opinion, we affirmed the convictions, but reversed and remanded the mandatory minimum sentences of life for the armed robbery and armed burglary convictions and remanded for the entry of mandatory minimum sentences of 25 years instead. Based on Hoover v. State, 877 So.2d 751 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), we held that section 775.087(2)(a)3., Florida Statutes (2008), provided that a defendant who discharged a firearm during the commission of certain enumerated felonies, including robbery and burglary, and, as the result of the discharge, caused the death of any person, could not be sentenced to a mandatory minimum sentence of more than 25 years. However, we are now constrained to affirm the sentences based on the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Mendenhall v. State, 48 So.3d 740 (Fla.2010), holding that section 775.087(2)(a)3. gives the trial court the discretion to impose a mandatory minimum sentence anywhere within the range of 25 years to life.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Graham v. State
160 So. 3d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 So. 3d 322, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3890, 2011 WL 985130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.