Dean v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Dean v. State

126 So. 416, 23 Ala. App. 423, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 55

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 18, 1930

Docket7 Div. 678.

StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 416 (Dean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dean v. State, 126 So. 416, 23 Ala. App. 423, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 55 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The'petitioner filed a petition for habeas corpus in all respects complying with chapter 151 of the Code of 3923, and alleging the statutory grounds thefefor as required by section 4332 of said Code. The preliminary writ was issued, in response to which respondent produced the body arid made return. The solicitor thereupon demurred to the petition, the demurrer was sustained, and the prayer of petition was denied.

The -petitioner was being held under a Governor’s warrant on requisition from another state, and the court evidently proceeded upon the assumption that the warrant of the Governor was the last word of authority on the subject and could not be denied. This is not the law. In Thacker v. State, 20 Ala. App. 302, 101 So. 636, this court gave to the Governor’s extradition warrant its full force, and in that case this court held that the Governor’s warrant, being regular on its face, made a prima facie case. This prima facie case is subject to such lawful claims ¡to relief as the petitioner may have, not going to the merits’ of the case or the jurisdiction of the foreign court issuing the original process. At least one of these claims might be that petitioner is not tbe identical person named in the warrant. There may be others, but tbe designation of them is unnecessary here.

The action of the court was a denial of petitioner’s right.

The order of the judge of probate is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the statutes.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The'petitioner filed a petition for habeas corpus in all respects complying with chapter 151 of the Code of 3923, and alleging the statutory grounds thefefor as required by section 4332 of said Code. The preliminary writ was issued, in response to which respondent produced the body arid made return. The solicitor thereupon demurred to the petition, the demurrer was sustained, and the prayer of petition was denied.

The -petitioner was being held under a Governor’s warrant on requisition from another state, and the court evidently proceeded upon the assumption that the warrant of the Governor was the last word of authority on the subject and could not be denied. This is not the law. In Thacker v. State, 20 Ala. App. 302, 101 So. 636, this court gave to the Governor’s extradition warrant its full force, and in that case this court held that the Governor’s warrant, being regular on its face, made a prima facie case. This prima facie case is subject to such lawful claims ¡to relief as the petitioner may have, not going to the merits’ of the case or the jurisdiction of the foreign court issuing the original process. At least one of these claims might be that petitioner is not tbe identical person named in the warrant. There may be others, but tbe designation of them is unnecessary here.

The action of the court was a denial of petitioner’s right.

The order of the judge of probate is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the statutes.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 So. 416, 23 Ala. App. 423, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-state-alactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack