Dean v. Sessions

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Dean v. Sessions

1924 OK 199, 223 P. 835, 101 Okla. 102, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 31

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 19, 1924·No. 12798·Published

Opinion

COCHRAN, J.

Plaintiff in error filed its brief herein on November .1, 1923. No brief has been filed by defendants in error, and although an extension of time was granted to do so, they have not complied nor assigned any reason for failure to do so. Under the rule of this court, when the brief of plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, this court will not search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained.- Following this rule, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is reversed, *103 and the cause remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COCHRAN, J.

Plaintiff in error filed its brief herein on November .1, 1923. No brief has been filed by defendants in error, and although an extension of time was granted to do so, they have not complied nor assigned any reason for failure to do so. Under the rule of this court, when the brief of plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, this court will not search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained.- Following this rule, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is reversed, *103 and the cause remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.

All the Justices concur.

Dean v. Sessions, 1924 OK 199, 223 P. 835, 101 Okla. 102, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 31 (Okla. 1924).

Pincite

1924 OK 199 (Dean v. Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.