Dean v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 164 A.D. 912 (Dean v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, first, that the statements and conduct of the defendant’s foreman toward the plaintiff, after his injury, were improperly received. Second, that the verdict rendered was excessive; that the conduct of plaintiff’s counsel upon the trial was grossly improper, and tended to create passion and prejudice in the minds of the jurors and to increase the amount of them verdict. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 A.D. 912, 148 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nyappdiv-1914.