Dean v. Paschall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Dean v. Paschall

1943 OK 395, 143 P.2d 819, 193 Okla. 342, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 400

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 7, 1943·No. No. 30871.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed which alleges that the premises involved in the litigation are no longer in possession of the plaintiff in error and that the appeal has become moot. This motion is not resisted although this court called for a response to the motion to dismiss. Under such circumstances, as stated in Doerner v. Layton, 171 Okla. 522, 43 P. 2d 741, the appeal may be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed which alleges that the premises involved in the litigation are no longer in possession of the plaintiff in error and that the appeal has become moot. This motion is not resisted although this court called for a response to the motion to dismiss. Under such circumstances, as stated in Doerner v. Layton, 171 Okla. 522, 43 P. 2d 741, the appeal may be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Dean v. Paschall, 1943 OK 395, 143 P.2d 819, 193 Okla. 342, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 400 (Okla. 1943).

Pincite

1943 OK 395 (Dean v. Paschall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related