Dean v. Paschall

1943 OK 395, 143 P.2d 819, 193 Okla. 342, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 400
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 7, 1943
DocketNo. 30871.
StatusPublished

This text of 1943 OK 395 (Dean v. Paschall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dean v. Paschall, 1943 OK 395, 143 P.2d 819, 193 Okla. 342, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 400 (Okla. 1943).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed which alleges that the premises involved in the litigation are no longer in possession of the plaintiff in error and that the appeal has become moot. This motion is not resisted although this court called for a response to the motion to dismiss. Under such circumstances, as stated in Doerner v. Layton, 171 Okla. 522, 43 P. 2d 741, the appeal may be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doerner v. Layton
1935 OK 421 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1943 OK 395, 143 P.2d 819, 193 Okla. 342, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-paschall-okla-1943.