Dean v. Noble

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dean v. Noble

299 S.W.3d 5, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1475, 2009 WL 3347111

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 20, 2009

DocketWD 70343

StatusPublished

This text of 299 S.W.3d 5 (Dean v. Noble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dean v. Noble, 299 S.W.3d 5, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1475, 2009 WL 3347111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*6 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lester M. Dean Jr. appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Richard W. Noble in Mr. Dean’s action for specific performance of a contract. Mr. Dean contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Mr. Noble based on lack of standing and in denying his motion for leave to amend his petition.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*6 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lester M. Dean Jr. appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Richard W. Noble in Mr. Dean’s action for specific performance of a contract. Mr. Dean contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Mr. Noble based on lack of standing and in denying his motion for leave to amend his petition.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 S.W.3d 5, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1475, 2009 WL 3347111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-noble-moctapp-2009.