Dean v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 205 N.C. 848 (Dean v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The verdict established the fact that the plaintiff was not totally incapacitated within the meaning of the policy prior to its cancellation, and of course upon such verdict he is not entitled to recover.
There are certain exceptions to the admission of testimony and to the charge of the trial judge, but none of these are of sufficient moment to overthrow the judgment. The charge of the court, viewed and interpreted as a unit, does not transgress the principles of law pronounced in the case of Bulluck v. Ins. Co., 200 N. C., 642, 158 S. E., 185.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 N.C. 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nc-1934.