Dean v. McMullin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dean v. McMullin

163 A.D. 930, 147 N.Y.S. 1106

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1914·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the amount of the claim being disputed by plaintiffs, they were not entitled to an order of interpleader. (Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Arthur, 90 N. Y. 234.) The amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure by chapter 285 of the Laws of 1908, adding section 820a, did not change the rule of law in that respect. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the amount of the claim being disputed by plaintiffs, they were not entitled to an order of interpleader. (Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Arthur, 90 N. Y. 234.) The amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure by chapter 285 of the Laws of 1908, adding section 820a, did not change the rule of law in that respect. All concurred.

Dean v. McMullin, 163 A.D. 930, 147 N.Y.S. 1106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

163 A.D. 930 (Dean v. McMullin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related