Dean v. McMullin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dean v. McMullin

163 A.D. 930, 147 N.Y.S. 1106

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 930 (Dean v. McMullin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dean v. McMullin, 163 A.D. 930, 147 N.Y.S. 1106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the amount of the claim being disputed by plaintiffs, they were not entitled to an order of interpleader. (Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Arthur, 90 N. Y. 234.) The amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure by chapter 285 of the Laws of 1908, adding section 820a, did not change the rule of law in that respect. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the amount of the claim being disputed by plaintiffs, they were not entitled to an order of interpleader. (Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Arthur, 90 N. Y. 234.) The amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure by chapter 285 of the Laws of 1908, adding section 820a, did not change the rule of law in that respect. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 930, 147 N.Y.S. 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-mcmullin-nyappdiv-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack