Dean v. Marineways, Inc. of Fort Lauderdale
146 So. 2d 577
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1962·No. No. 3109·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
The judgment being appealed comes here under a presumption of correctness. The burden is on the appellant to make reversible error appear. This appellant has not satisfied this burden because the judgment is based partially or wholly on evidence which does not appear in the record on appeal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dean v. Marineways, Inc. of Fort Lauderdale, 146 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).
146 So. 2d 577 (Dean v. Marineways, Inc. of Fort Lauderdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grady v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
402 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Carroll v. Allen
219 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Sirmons v. D. C. White Homes, Inc.
176 So. 2d 366 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Patterson v. Patterson
170 So. 2d 453 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Montgomery
167 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Hammond v. Times Publishing Co.
162 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Canning v. Norton
155 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Terry v. Phillips
155 So. 2d 158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)