Dean v. Johnson
216 A.D. 773
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The record indicates that the claimant, under his contract, might have procured the work to be done by others than himself, and did in fact [774]*774employ others to this end. As he was not required to provide his own personal services to cut the timber we think he was an independent contractor. All concur. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dean v. Johnson, 216 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
216 A.D. 773 (Dean v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Hurst v. Fehr & Sons
225 A.D. 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)