Dean v. Johnson

216 A.D. 773
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D. 773 (Dean v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dean v. Johnson, 216 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record indicates that the claimant, under his contract, might have procured the work to be done by others than himself, and did in fact [774]*774employ others to this end. As he was not required to provide his own personal services to cut the timber we think he was an independent contractor. All concur. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Hurst v. Fehr & Sons
225 A.D. 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D. 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1926.