Dean v. Hatala

Supreme Court of Florida

Dean v. Hatala

179 So. 2d 855, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2927

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 10, 1965

DocketNo. 34560

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 So. 2d 855 (Dean v. Hatala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dean v. Hatala, 179 So. 2d 855, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2927 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission b.earing date June 2, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

[856]*856Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI