Dean v. Dean

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dean v. Dean

167 So. 2d 334

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 22, 1964

DocketNo. 64-407

StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 2d 334 (Dean v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dean v. Dean, 167 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a father’s interlocutory appeal from a post decretal order in a divorce suit granting the mother’s petition for leave to remove their minor daughter from this jurisdiction to the State of Michigan.

Appellant’s main contention is that the chancellor’s order should be reversed because it was not shown that the best interests of the child would be served by modifying the custody provision of the divorce decree.

■ We have carefully considered the appellant’s contention in the light of the record, briefs and oral argument, and conclude that the order appealed is without harmful or reversible error. Appellant’s other conten-tentions have been considered but we do not find any reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a father’s interlocutory appeal from a post decretal order in a divorce suit granting the mother’s petition for leave to remove their minor daughter from this jurisdiction to the State of Michigan.

Appellant’s main contention is that the chancellor’s order should be reversed because it was not shown that the best interests of the child would be served by modifying the custody provision of the divorce decree.

■ We have carefully considered the appellant’s contention in the light of the record, briefs and oral argument, and conclude that the order appealed is without harmful or reversible error. Appellant’s other conten-tentions have been considered but we do not find any reversible error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 So. 2d 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-dean-fladistctapp-1964.