Dean v. Clarke
5 La. 105
Opinion
[106]*106The judgment of the court was pronounced by
The judgment for twenty-five dollars upon the reconventional demand, does not fall under our jurisdiction.
The reasons of the district judge for sustaining the exception are satisfactory.
It is therefore decreed, that the judgment of the district court sustaining the exception be affirmed; and that so far as concerns the judgment upon the re-conventional demand, the appeal be dismissed; the plaintiff paying the costs of the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dean v. Clarke, 5 La. 105 (La. 1850).
5 La. 105 (Dean v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Succession of Heffner
21 So. 905 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1897)
Burton v. Anderson
1 Tex. 93 (Texas Supreme Court, 1846)