Dean v. Adler

30 Md. 147, 1869 Md. LEXIS 18
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 17, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 Md. 147 (Dean v. Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dean v. Adler, 30 Md. 147, 1869 Md. LEXIS 18 (Md. 1869).

Opinion

Milleb, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The sole object of the bill in this case is to enforce as against the children of William Eloss and Sarah, his wife, Specific performance of a covenant contained in the lease of the 1st of May, 1857, from Sarah Eloss and Gump, the trustee, to Janney.

Without deciding whether the power of sale and re-investment contained in the deed of trust of the 14th of October, 1851, embraced a power to lease the property or any part of it, we are clearly of opinion that Mrs. Eloss, the cestui que trust for life, had no authority under the power conferred upon her in that deed, to enter into the covenant in question so as to bind these children, the cestuis que trust in remainder, after the expiration of her life estate. We fully concur in what is said by the Judge of the Circuit Court in his opinion upon this branch of the case, and for the reasons thus stated by him the decree dismissing the bill must be affirmed with costs.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powers v. Wells
91 N.E. 717 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Md. 147, 1869 Md. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-v-adler-md-1869.