Dean, M. v. Bowling Green-Brandywine
203 A.3d 973
This text of 203 A.3d 973 (Dean, M. v. Bowling Green-Brandywine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dean, M. v. Bowling Green-Brandywine, 203 A.3d 973 (Pa. 2019).
Opinion
AND NOW, this 4 th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
a. Whether the Superior Court, in reviewing a nonsuit, properly applied the provisions of the Mental Health Procedures Act ("MHPA") and the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs in granting limited immunity to a drug addiction treatment facility and its physicians where the individual who died while under the care of the facility was not mentally ill and did not seek voluntary inpatient treatment for a mental illness.
b. Whether the Superior Court properly applied fundamental notions of due process and the provisions of the Mental Health Procedures Act ("MHPA") to an individual who did not give consent to voluntary treatment under the MHPA.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
203 A.3d 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dean-m-v-bowling-green-brandywine-pa-2019.