Dean Chance Balikos v. State
154 So. 3d 1191, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 143, 2015 WL 71646
Opinion
The order denying appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence is affirmed. An alleged error in the procedures used in imposing an enhanced sentence does not result in an “illegal sentence” that can be corrected at any time under rule 3.800(a). Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117, 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 (Fla.2001)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dean Chance Balikos v. State, 154 So. 3d 1191, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 143, 2015 WL 71646 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
154 So. 3d 1191 (Dean Chance Balikos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ives v. State
993 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Bover v. State
797 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)