Dealers Insurance Co. v. Centennial Casualty Co.
This text of 654 So. 2d 676 (Dealers Insurance Co. v. Centennial Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Dealers Ins. Co. v. Centennial Casualty Co., 644 So.2d 571 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (holding that bad check insurer, as subrogee of automobile auction operator, was an authorized claimant under statutorily required motor vehicle dealer surety bond), review denied, No. 84,928, — So.2d — (Fla. Apr. 12, 1995); see also Schwab & Co. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (“The discretion reposed in the trial judge by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540 is of the broadest scope and in order to reverse a judge’s ruling thereunder, there must be a showing of a gross abuse of discretion.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
654 So. 2d 676, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5414, 1995 WL 302347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dealers-insurance-co-v-centennial-casualty-co-fladistctapp-1995.