Deal v. State
309 So. 2d 43, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14325
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of the order denying his motion to vacate judgment and sentence entered for the offense of robbery.
We have carefully examined the record-on-appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. Upon our consideration thereof, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below, and the order appealed herein is accordingly
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Deal v. State, 309 So. 2d 43, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14325 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
309 So. 2d 43 (Deal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Locke v. Aetna Acceptance Corporation
309 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)