Deal v. North Carolina Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Deal v. North Carolina Department of Corrections

551 F. App'x 79

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2014·No. No. 13-7492·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger Lee Deal, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deal v. N.C. Dep’t of Corrs., No. 3:12-cv-00364-RJC, 2013 WL 4782624 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2013). We deny Deal’s motion to appoint a mediator, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger Lee Deal, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deal v. N.C. Dep’t of Corrs., No. 3:12-cv-00364-RJC, 2013 WL 4782624 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2013). We deny Deal’s motion to appoint a mediator, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Deal v. North Carolina Department of Corrections, 551 F. App'x 79 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

551 F. App'x 79 (Deal v. North Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related