Deal v. Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Deal v. Miller

90 A. 1070, 245 Pa. 1, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 818

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 30, 1914·No. Appeals, Nos. 29 and 59·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appeal No. 29 is from a decree dissolving a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the management of a corporation of which they had been elected directors. Appeal No. 59 is from a decree sustaining the defendants’ demurrer and dismissing the bill. The controlling question, the power of a court of equity to determine the validity of the election, [7]*7is the same in each appeal. Nothing can be added with profit to what has been so well said by the learned judge of the Common Pleas on whose opinion we affirm both decrees at the cost of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Appeal No. 29 is from a decree dissolving a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the management of a corporation of which they had been elected directors. Appeal No. 59 is from a decree sustaining the defendants’ demurrer and dismissing the bill. The controlling question, the power of a court of equity to determine the validity of the election, [7]*7is the same in each appeal. Nothing can be added with profit to what has been so well said by the learned judge of the Common Pleas on whose opinion we affirm both decrees at the cost of the appellants.

Deal v. Miller, 90 A. 1070, 245 Pa. 1, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 818 (Pa. 1914).

Pincite

90 A. 1070 (Deal v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related