Deal v. Miller

90 A. 1070, 245 Pa. 1, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 818
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 30, 1914
DocketAppeals, Nos. 29 and 59
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 90 A. 1070 (Deal v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deal v. Miller, 90 A. 1070, 245 Pa. 1, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 818 (Pa. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appeal No. 29 is from a decree dissolving a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the management of a corporation of which they had been elected directors. Appeal No. 59 is from a decree sustaining the defendants’ demurrer and dismissing the bill. The controlling question, the power of a court of equity to determine the validity of the election, [7]*7is the same in each appeal. Nothing can be added with profit to what has been so well said by the learned judge of the Common Pleas on whose opinion we affirm both decrees at the cost of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carrier v. Shearer
57 Pa. D. & C.2d 631 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Helsel v. RODGERS
269 A.2d 917 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Milasinovich v. Serbian Progressive Club, Inc.
84 A.2d 571 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Siranovich v. Butkovich
58 A.2d 461 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Rockwood Water Co. v. Wolf
33 Pa. D. & C. 115 (Somerset County Court of Common Pleas, 1938)
Cella v. Davidson
156 A. 99 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Grant v. Elder
170 P. 198 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A. 1070, 245 Pa. 1, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deal-v-miller-pa-1914.