Deal v. Handson

449 S.E.2d 692, 214 Ga. App. 844, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3072, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1100
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Deal v. Handson. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 Ga. App. 499
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 15, 1994·No. A93A1607; A93A1608·Published

Opinion

Andrews, Judge.

In Deal v. Handson, 210 Ga. App. 499 (436 SE2d 519) (1993), this court reversed the trial court’s judgment which denied defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Handsons’ complaint based, in our Division 2, on the insufficiency of the OCGA § 9-11-9.1 affidavit. In Handson v. HCA Health Svcs, of Ga., 264 Ga. 293 (443 SE2d 831) (1994), the Supreme Court reversed our opinion, finding the affidavit adequate. Accordingly, this court’s original judgment is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is hereby made the judgment of this court.

Judgments affirmed.

Pope, C. J., and Birdsong, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deal v. Handson, 449 S.E.2d 692, 214 Ga. App. 844, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3072, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 1100 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

449 S.E.2d 692 (Deal v. Handson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deal v. Handson
436 S.E.2d 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Handson v. HCA Health Services of Georgia, Inc.
443 S.E.2d 831 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)