Deal v. Erie Coal & Coke Co.

92 A. 701, 246 Pa. 552, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 553
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 26, 1914·No. Appeal, No. 172·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from a decree granting a preliminary-injunction to restrain the defendants until final hearing from holding a stockholders’ meeting for the election of officers of a corporation. The court had jurisdiction to make the decree complained of, Tunis v. Railroad, 149 Pa. 70; Jenkins v. Baxter, 160 Pa. 199, and we are not convinced that its discretion was, under the facts, improperly exercised. Upon an appeal from a decree granting or refusing a preliminary injunction'we look only to see if there were apparently reasonable grounds for the action of the court. If an appeal is taken from the final decree all questions involved will be open for consideration.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deal v. Erie Coal & Coke Co., 92 A. 701, 246 Pa. 552, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 553 (Pa. 1914).

92 A. 701 (Deal v. Erie Coal & Coke Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapital v. Walker
30 So. 2d 150 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1947)
Salus v. Lawrence, SEC. of Com.
3 A.2d 696 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Howard v. Goodnough
141 A. 483 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Lesher v. Thomas S. Gassner Co.
131 A. 657 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Davis v. Porch Bros.
112 A. 32 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Brock v. Atlantic Refining Co.
111 A. 47 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Holden v. Llewellyn
105 A. 639 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Deal v. Erie Coal & Coke Co.
93 A. 829 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)