Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Deal v. Ecklund

Deal v. Ecklund

41 So. 3d 430, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 2010 WL 3056627
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 2010·No. No. 5D10-444·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant Petitioner’s application for review of the trial court’s order permitting Respondents to videotape Petitioner’s compulsory medical exam. Prince v. Mallari, 36 So.3d 128 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). That portion of the order that permits Respondents to videotape the exam is quashed.

PETITION GRANTED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deal v. Ecklund, 41 So. 3d 430, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 2010 WL 3056627 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

41 So. 3d 430 (Deal v. Ecklund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prince v. Mallari
36 So. 3d 128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)