Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Deal v. Ecklund

Deal v. Ecklund

41 So. 3d 430, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 2010 WL 3056627
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 2010
DocketNo. 5D10-444
StatusPublished

This text of 41 So. 3d 430 (Deal v. Ecklund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deal v. Ecklund, 41 So. 3d 430, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 2010 WL 3056627 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant Petitioner’s application for review of the trial court’s order permitting Respondents to videotape Petitioner’s compulsory medical exam. Prince v. Mallari, 36 So.3d 128 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). That portion of the order that permits Respondents to videotape the exam is quashed.

PETITION GRANTED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prince v. Mallari
36 So. 3d 128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 So. 3d 430, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 2010 WL 3056627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deal-v-ecklund-fladistctapp-2010.