Deakins v. Commercial Driveaway
231 N.W. 133, 250 Mich. 572, 1930 Mich. LEXIS 1016
Opinion
This case involves similar employment and the same accident and circumstances set forth in Klettke v. C. J. CommercialDriveaway, ante, 454, and all legal points involved are covered in, and controlled by, the opinion in that case.
The award is affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.
BUTZEL, CLARK, McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Deakins v. Commercial Driveaway, 231 N.W. 133, 250 Mich. 572, 1930 Mich. LEXIS 1016 (Mich. 1930).
231 N.W. 133 (Deakins v. Commercial Driveaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.