Deak v. Deak

715 So. 2d 1176, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11000, 1998 WL 542805
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 1998·No. No. 97-2082·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Duna v. Duna, 707 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Wolfson v. Unemployment Comm., 649 So.2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Parlier v. Eagle-Pictier Industries, Inc., 622 So.2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Pape v. Pape, 444 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Levine v. Arvida Corp., 405 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Robinson v. Bailey, 370 So.2d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

COBB, W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deak v. Deak, 715 So. 2d 1176, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11000, 1998 WL 542805 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

715 So. 2d 1176 (Deak v. Deak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pape v. Pape
444 So. 2d 1058 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Parlier v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES
622 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
649 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Levine v. Arvida Corp.
405 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Robinson v. Bailey
370 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Duna v. Duna
707 So. 2d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)