Deafueh Monbo v. Harford Memorial Hospital

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 2021
Docket21-1174
StatusUnpublished

This text of Deafueh Monbo v. Harford Memorial Hospital (Deafueh Monbo v. Harford Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deafueh Monbo v. Harford Memorial Hospital, (4th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1174

DEAFUEH MONBO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

JUAHDI MONBO,

Plaintiff,

v.

UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.; HARFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC.; ESKINDER AFEWORK, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; DEREK ANDREW MCCOY, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; LAURENCE MARC EDELMAN, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; NICK NIKOLAOS T. LOMIS, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; ASHLEY KIMBEL, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; REBECCA N. SMITH, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; DANA M. SAULSBURY, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; ADAM ROSENBLATT, individually and as an employee of Harford Memorial Hospital, Inc.; BRIAN GREGORY LAROCCO, individually and as an employee of Harford Memorial Hospital, Inc.; UNION HOSPITAL OF CECIL COUNTY, INC.; CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; BRITTNI D. JONES, individually and as an employee of Union Hospital of Cecil County, Inc.; TIMOTHY CLARKE, individually and as an employee of Union Hospital of Cecil County, Inc.,

Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00004-CCB)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deafueh Monbo, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anthony Damiano, SHAW, MORROW & JOSEPH, PA, Hunt Valley, Maryland; Michael Kevin Wiggins, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT & KLEIN, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland; Benjamin Skipp Harvey, KIERNAN TREBACH, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Carolyn Israel Stein, CAROLYN STEIN, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Deafueh Monbo seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion for

recusal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen

v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Monbo seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Vuono

v. United States, 441 F.2d 271, 272 (4th Cir. 1971). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Frank Vuono v. United States
441 F.2d 271 (Fourth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Deafueh Monbo v. Harford Memorial Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deafueh-monbo-v-harford-memorial-hospital-ca4-2021.