Deacon v. Pandora Media, Inc.
This text of 655 F. App'x 581 (Deacon v. Pandora Media, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme Court, [582]*582which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016.
In view of the Court’s answer, which dispositively resolves-this case, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid[582]*582ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
655 F. App'x 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deacon-v-pandora-media-inc-ca9-2016.