Deacon v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

86 S.E. 91, 17 Ga. App. 74, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 263
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 10, 1915·No. 6179·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

Deacon and the Equitable Life Assurance Society entered into a contract which provided that it might “be terminated by either party t>y a notice in writing delivered personally, or mailed to the other party at the last-known address, at least thirty days before the date therein fixed for such termination.” The contract is plain and unambiguous in its terms, and provides, among other things, that “the society shall have the right to deduct from renewal commissions hereunder two per cent, of renewal premiums paid when second party is not representing it as agent under written contract.” The contract was legally terminated, in accordance with the terms of the agreement between the parties, and after its termination the assurance society deducted from the renewal premiums paid to its former agent two per cent., in accordance with the provision above recited. The agent sued for amounts so deducted, and the trial court found in favor of the defendant. Held: The court did not err in finding for the defendant on the agreed statement of facts. Judgment affirmed.

Complaint; from municipal court of Atlanta. October 5, 1914. H. H. Turner, for plaintiff. Brown & Randolph, Parker & Scott, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deacon v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 86 S.E. 91, 17 Ga. App. 74, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 263 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

86 S.E. 91 (Deacon v. Equitable Life Assurance Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merrill v. Continental Assurance Co.
200 Cal. App. 2d 663 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Foster v. Union Central Life Insurance
119 S.E.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Carson v. Sun Life Assurance Co.
192 S.E. 241 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)