De Wolf v. McNabb

1 A. 440, 1 Sadler 156, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 669

• Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
• Decided: October 26, 1885
• Status: Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We have given the evidence in this case a careful examination and consideration. The main contention is that of fraud in the transaction.

This opened a wide door to the admission of evidence.

There certainly was evidence tending to show the conveyance by Smith to Hofius was made and accepted with intent to defraud McNabb; and there is also sufficient evidence to submit to the jury that He Wolf was not a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. The evidence was fairly submitted, and we see no sufficient reason for disturbing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.