De Vore Building Corp. v. Lipkind
225 A.D. 672
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1928·Published
Opinion
Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed awarding possession to the plaintiff, subject to an easement in the defendant so long as the encroaching wall shall stand. (Wilson v. Wightman, 36 App. Div. 41.) Settle order on notice, reversing findings inconsistent with this determination and containing such new findings of facts proved upon the trial as are necessary to sustain the judgment hereby awarded. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
De Vore Building Corp. v. Lipkind, 225 A.D. 672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
225 A.D. 672 (De Vore Building Corp. v. Lipkind) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Wightman
36 A.D. 41 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)