De Vito v. Imperial Tower, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

De Vito v. Imperial Tower, Inc.

32 A.D.2d 537, 300 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 537 (De Vito v. Imperial Tower, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Vito v. Imperial Tower, Inc., 32 A.D.2d 537, 300 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff wife and for loss of services and medical expenses incurred by plaintiff husband, defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme 'Court, Kings County, entered October 21, 1968 in favor of plaintiffs [538]*538upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, plaintiffs’ proof, uncontroverted .by defendant, was sufficient to establish actionable negligence on the part of defendant (cf. Epstein v. Sixty Wall Tower, 27 A D 2d 988). Brennan, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuseello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff wife and for loss of services and medical expenses incurred by plaintiff husband, defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme 'Court, Kings County, entered October 21, 1968 in favor of plaintiffs [538]*538upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, plaintiffs’ proof, uncontroverted .by defendant, was sufficient to establish actionable negligence on the part of defendant (cf. Epstein v. Sixty Wall Tower, 27 A D 2d 988). Brennan, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuseello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 537, 300 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-vito-v-imperial-tower-inc-nyappdiv-1969.