De Villanueva v. Mukasey
This text of 300 F. App'x 477 (De Villanueva v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ana Perez De Villanueva, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of her motion to reopen the BIA’s underlying denial of her application for cancellation of removal based on petitioner’s failure to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her qualifying relatives.
The evidence that petitioner presented with her motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as her application for cancellation of removal. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the evidence was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of hardship. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 601-03 (9th Cir .2006).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 F. App'x 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-villanueva-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.