De Varco v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission

281 A.D. 955
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Rent Administrator was entitled to consider the experience in the preceding- year under the previous ownership in determining the net return. His construction of the statute is a reasonable one. We also hold that the Administrator was not arbitrary and was entitled to find that the assessed valuation should be used, despite the recent sale at a lower figure. Order unanimously reversed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, the determination reinstated and the petition dismissed. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Varco v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission, 281 A.D. 955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

281 A.D. 955 (De Varco v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florell Equities, Inc. v. Weaver
2 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Florell Equities, Inc. v. Weaver
5 Misc. 2d 97 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)