De Vanworth v. Bouchon's Heirs

Supreme Court of Louisiana

De Vanworth v. Bouchon's Heirs

2 Mart. (N.S.) 536

DecidedJune 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Mart. (N.S.) 536 (De Vanworth v. Bouchon's Heirs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

De Vanworth v. Bouchon's Heirs, 2 Mart. (N.S.) 536 (La. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin,J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff claims from the curator of the estate, a sum of money which he alleges, is, and was due her by Bouchon, the deceased, for board, money advanced, and goods furnish- ed. The general issue and set off were pleaded.

The court of probates reduced her claim to $10, and she appealed.

No question of law arises in the case, and in weighing the evidence, we are unable to conclude the judge erred, the testimony being very desultory.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be affirmed with costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin,J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff claims from the curator of the estate, a sum of money which he alleges, is, and was due her by Bouchon, the deceased, for board, money advanced, and goods furnish- ed. The general issue and set off were pleaded.

The court of probates reduced her claim to $10, and she appealed.

No question of law arises in the case, and in weighing the evidence, we are unable to conclude the judge erred, the testimony being very desultory.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be affirmed with costs,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Mart. (N.S.) 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-vanworth-v-bouchons-heirs-la-1824.