D.E. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.E. v. State

967 So. 2d 384, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16310, 2007 WL 3005775

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 2007·No. No. 3D06-2667·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.E. appeals the trial court’s order finding him guilty of carrying a concealed firearm in violation of sections 790.01(2) and 775.087, Florida Statutes (2006). D.E. contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination. We affirm.

Here, there is competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings and we do not disturb the trial court’s credibility determinations. See, e.g., C.C., Jr. v. State, 943 So.2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); K.M. v. State, 545 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

D.E. appeals the trial court’s order finding him guilty of carrying a concealed firearm in violation of sections 790.01(2) and 775.087, Florida Statutes (2006). D.E. contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination. We affirm.

Here, there is competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings and we do not disturb the trial court’s credibility determinations. See, e.g., C.C., Jr. v. State, 943 So.2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); K.M. v. State, 545 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

D.E. v. State, 967 So. 2d 384, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16310, 2007 WL 3005775 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

967 So. 2d 384 (D.E. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related