D.E. v. State

967 So. 2d 384, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16310, 2007 WL 3005775
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 17, 2007
DocketNo. 3D06-2667
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 967 So. 2d 384 (D.E. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.E. v. State, 967 So. 2d 384, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16310, 2007 WL 3005775 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.E. appeals the trial court’s order finding him guilty of carrying a concealed firearm in violation of sections 790.01(2) and 775.087, Florida Statutes (2006). D.E. contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination. We affirm.

Here, there is competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings and we do not disturb the trial court’s credibility determinations. See, e.g., C.C., Jr. v. State, 943 So.2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); K.M. v. State, 545 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DELFANI v. Cromer
967 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
967 So. 2d 384, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16310, 2007 WL 3005775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.