De Urbaez v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

502 N.E.2d 993, 68 N.Y.2d 930, 510 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20882
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 11, 1986·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment granted and case remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Presiding Justice Francis T. Murphy at the Appellate Division (116 AD2d 534, 535-538). We add only that clause 17 of the policy is applicable notwithstanding the fact that the claim against the insurance company is for first-party benefits required by Insurance Law article 51. Under Insurance Law § 5103, no-fault insurance is mandated as a part of every owner’s liability insurance policy and, hence, is included in part I of the policy here to which clause 17 applies.

[933]*933Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Urbaez v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 502 N.E.2d 993, 68 N.Y.2d 930, 510 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20882 (N.Y. 1986).

502 N.E.2d 993 (De Urbaez v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BRENTWOOD PAIN & REHABILITATION SERV. v. Allstate Ins. Co.
508 F. Supp. 2d 278 (S.D. New York, 2007)
In re the Arbitration between Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. & Brooks
13 A.D.3d 198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Kujbida v. Horizon Insurance Agency, Inc.
632 N.E.2d 151 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1994)